TRO101 logo TRO101

2022-cv-02115

The Mountain Corporation v. The Individuals, Corporations, Limited Liability Companies, Partnerships, and Unincorporated Associations Identified On Schedule A Hereto

法院:伊利诺伊州北法院
发案日期:2022-04-25
原告:The Mountain
代理律所:HSP
诉讼类型:商标
# Date Description
[+] 1 2022-04-25 COMPLAINT filed by The Mountain Corporation; Jury Demand. Filing fee $ 402, receipt number 0752-19371630.
2 2022-04-25 CIVIL Cover Sheet
3 2022-04-25 ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff The Mountain Corporation by Michael A. Hierl
4 2022-04-25 ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff The Mountain Corporation by William Benjamin Kalbac
5 2022-04-25 ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff The Mountain Corporation by Robert Payton Mcmurray
6 2022-04-25 MOTION by Plaintiff The Mountain Corporation to seal document Plaintiff's Motion for Leave to File Under Seal
7 2022-04-25 SEALED DOCUMENT by Plaintiff The Mountain Corporation Sealed Schedule A
[+] 8 2022-04-25 NOTIFICATION of Affiliates pursuant to Local Rule 3.2 by The Mountain Corporation
9 2022-04-25 MOTION by Plaintiff The Mountain Corporation for leave to file excess pages Plaintiff's Motion to Exceed Page Limitation
10 2022-04-25 MOTION by Plaintiff The Mountain Corporation for temporary restraining order Plaintiff's Ex Parte Motion for Entry of a Temporary Restraining Order, Including a Temporary Injunction, a Temporary Transfer of the Defendant Domain Names, a Temporary Asset Restraint, Expedited Discovery, and Service of Process by Email and/or Electronic Publication
[+] 11 2022-04-25 MEMORANDUM by The Mountain Corporation in support of motion for temporary restraining order, 10
12 2022-04-25 SEALED DOCUMENT by Plaintiff The Mountain Corporation Exhibit 2 Part 1 of Doyon Declaration
13 2022-04-25 SEALED DOCUMENT by Plaintiff The Mountain Corporation Exhibit 2 Part 2 of Doyon Declaration
14 2022-04-25 SEALED DOCUMENT by Plaintiff The Mountain Corporation Exhibit 2 Part 3 of Doyon Declaration
15 2022-04-25 SEALED EXHIBIT by Plaintiff The Mountain Corporation Exhibit 2 Part 4 of Doyon Declaration regarding memorandum in support of motion, 11
16 2022-04-25 SEALED DOCUMENT by Plaintiff The Mountain Corporation Exhibit 2 Part 5 of Doyon Declaration
17 2022-04-25 SEALED DOCUMENT by Plaintiff The Mountain Corporation Exhibit 2 Part 6 of Doyon Declaration
18 2022-04-25 Notice of Claims Involving Trademarks by The Mountain Corporation
19 2022-04-28 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Martha M. Pacold: For the reasons set forth in plaintiff's motions, the supporting memoranda, and the temporary restraining order, plaintiff's motions for leave to file excess pages 9, for leave to file under seal 6, and for a temporary restraining order, including a temporary injunction, a temporary transfer of the defendant domain names, a temporary asset restraint, expedited discovery, and electronic service of process 10, are granted. Plaintiff's filings support proceeding (for the time being) on an ex parte basis. Specifically, were defendants to be informed of this proceeding before a TRO could issue, it is likely assets and websites would be redirected, thus defeating plaintiff's interests in identifying defendants, stopping defendants' infringing conduct, and obtaining an accounting. In addition, the evidence submitted by plaintiff shows a substantial likelihood of success on the merits (including evidence of active infringement and sales into Illinois), the harm to plaintiff is irreparable, and an injunction is in the public interest. Electronic service of process does not violate any treaty and is consistent with due process because it effectively communicates the pendency of this action to defendants. As other judges in this district have noted, there may be reason to question both the propriety of the joinder of all defendants in this one action and whether plaintiff genuinely intends to pursue an accounting (which plaintiff asserts as justification for an asset freeze), but at this preliminary stage, the court is persuaded that plaintiff has provided sufficient evidence of coordinated activity and the prospect of an accounting to justify the requested relief as to all defendants. Expedited discovery is warranted to identify defendants and to implement the asset freeze. If any defendant appears and objects, the court will revisit the asset freeze and joinder. Plaintiff shall deposit with the Clerk of Court ten thousand dollars ($10,000.00), either cash or surety bond, as security.
20 2022-04-28 SEALED TEMPORARY RESTRAINING ORDER Signed by the Honorable Martha M. Pacold on 4/28/2022:
21 2022-05-06 SURETY BOND in the amount of $ 10,000.00 posted by The Mountain Corporation. (Document not scanned)
22 2022-05-09 MOTION by Plaintiff The Mountain Corporation for extension of time Plaintiff's Ex Parte Motion to Extend the Temporary Restraining Order
[+] 23 2022-05-10 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Martha M. Pacold: For the reasons set forth in Plaintiff's motion to extend the temporary restraining order 22 and in the court's order granting the temporary restraining order 20, Plaintiff's motion to extend the temporary restraining order 22 is granted. The temporary restraining order is extended to 5/26/2022.
24 2022-05-19 MOTION by Plaintiff The Mountain Corporation for preliminary injunction Plaintiff's Motion for Entry of a Preliminary Injunction
25 2022-05-19 MEMORANDUM by The Mountain Corporation in support of motion for preliminary injunction 24
26 2022-05-19 DECLARATION of Michael A. Hierl regarding motion for preliminary injunction 24
27 2022-05-20 SUMMONS Returned Executed by The Mountain Corporation as to The Individuals, Corporations, Limited Liability Companies, Partnerships, and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule A Hereto on 5/19/2022, answer due 6/9/2022.
28 2022-05-23 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Martha M. Pacold: Plaintiff shall serve defendants with this notice. The court has taken the motion for preliminary injunction 24 under advisement and will consider the motion unopposed if no defendant appears and objects by 5/31/2022.
29 2022-05-24 CERTIFICATE of Service Proof of Service by William Benjamin Kalbac on behalf of The Mountain Corporation
30 2022-06-07 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Martha M. Pacold: On 5/23/2022, the court gave all defendants until 5/31/2022 to appear and object to plaintiff's motion for preliminary injunction. 28. No defendant has filed an appearance to object to the entry of a preliminary injunction. For the same reasons the TRO was granted, a preliminary injunction is appropriate, and is unopposed. Plaintiff's motion for preliminary injunction 24 is granted. Enter Preliminary Injunction. Plaintiff's counsel is directed to add all defendants listed on Schedule A to the court's docket within three business days. Instructions on how to do so may be located on the court's website at www.ilnd.uscourts.gov/instructions.
31 2022-06-07 PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION ORDER Signed by the Honorable Martha M. Pacold on 6/7/2022:
[+] 32 2022-06-07 ORDER: The Clerk of Court is directed to unseal Plaintiff's Pleading(s) [DOCKET NO.11] and Exhibits 1 - 6 thereto [DOCKET NO.12], [DOCKET NO.13], [DOCKET NO.14, 16-17], Schedule A to the Pleading(s) [DOCKET NO.7], Exhibit 1 to the Declaration of Roger M. Doyon [DOCKET NO.15], and the TRO [DOCKET NO.20]. Signed by the Honorable Martha M. Pacold on 6/7/2022. Mailed notice
33 2022-08-26 DECLARATION of William B. Kalbac Declaration of Service
34 2022-08-26 MOTION by Plaintiff The Mountain Corporation for default judgment as to Plaintiff's Motion for Entry of Default and Default Judgment Against the Defendants Identified in Amended Schedule A
[+] 35 2022-08-26 MEMORANDUM by The Mountain Corporation in support of motion for default judgment 34
[+] 36 2022-08-26 DECLARATION of Michael A. Hierl regarding motion for default judgment 34
37 2022-09-13 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Martha M. Pacold: Any defendant objecting to Plaintiff's motion for entry of default and default judgment 34 must enter an appearance and file a written objection by 9/26/2022. If no objections are filed, the court will consider the motion unopposed. Plaintiff shall serve defendants with this notice.
38 2022-10-05 ORDER: No defendant has responded to plaintiff's motion for entry of default and default judgment 34. The motion 34 is granted. Based on the evidence submitted in support of the temporary restraining order and the motion for entry of default and default judgment, and the admission of liability by virtue of the default, plaintiff has established that the infringement was willful, that damages should be awarded in the amount of $100,000 per defendant, and that a permanent injunction should be entered. Plaintiff has shown that the infringement of its marks causes it irreparable harm in the form of diminished goodwill and brand confidence, damage to plaintiff's reputation, loss of exclusivity, and loss of future sales; that monetary damages are inadequate to address these harms; and that the public interest would not be disserved by a permanent injunction. No defendant has appeared to argue otherwise, thus, the court also finds that the balance of the hardships favors an injunction. The ten thousand dollars ($10,000) surety bond posted by plaintiff is hereby released to plaintiff's counsel. The Clerk of the Court is directed to return the surety bond previously deposited with the Clerk of the Court to plaintiff's counsel Michael A. Hierl, Hughes Socol Piers Resnick & Dym Ltd., 70 West Madison St., Suite 4000, Chicago, IL 60602 via certified mail. Enter Final Judgment Order. Terminate civil case. Signed by the Honorable Martha M. Pacold on 10/5/2022. Mailed notice
[+] 39 2022-10-05 DEFAULT JUDGMENT ORDER Signed by the Honorable Martha M. Pacold on 10/5/2022. Mailed notice
40 2022-11-15 RETURN of U.S. Post Office Receipt, article no. 7019 2280 0000 0962 7616.