TRO101 logo TRO101

2022-cv-02755

Khara Inc. et al v. The Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule A

法院:伊利诺伊州北法院
发案日期:2022-05-25
原告:KHARA INC. and GROUND WORKS CO., LTD.
代理律所:Keith
诉讼类型:商标、版权
# Date Description
[+] 1 2022-05-25 COMPLAINT filed by Khara Inc., Ground Works Co., Ltd.; Filing fee $ 402, receipt number AILNDC-19500889.
2 2022-05-25 SEALED DOCUMENT by Plaintiffs Ground Works Co., Ltd., Khara Inc. Schedule A to Complaint (1)
3 2022-05-25 CIVIL Cover Sheet
4 2022-05-25 ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiffs Ground Works Co., Ltd., Khara Inc. by Keith A. Vogt
5 2022-05-25 ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiffs Ground Works Co., Ltd., Khara Inc. by Yanling Jiang
6 2022-05-25 ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiffs Ground Works Co., Ltd., Khara Inc. by Yi Bu
[+] 7 2022-05-25 ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiffs Ground Works Co., Ltd., Khara Inc. by Adam Grodman
8 2022-05-26 MOTION by Plaintiffs Ground Works Co., Ltd., Khara Inc. for leave to file under seal
9 2022-05-26 MOTION by Plaintiffs Ground Works Co., Ltd., Khara Inc. for leave to file excess pages
[+] 11 2022-05-26 MEMORANDUM in support of [10] Exparte Motion
12 2022-05-26 SEALED EXHIBIT by Plaintiffs Ground Works Co., Ltd., Khara Inc. Sealed Exhibit 2, Declaration of Yasuhiro Kamimura regarding memorandum in support of motion, [11]
13 2022-05-27 MAILED trademark report to Patent Trademark Office, Alexandria VA.
14 2022-05-27 MAILED to plaintiff(s) counsel Lanham Mediation Program materials.
15 2022-06-07 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Manish S. Shah: Plaintiffs' ex parte motion for a temporary restraining order, asset restraint, expedited discovery, and electronic service of process, motion for excess pages, and motion to seal 8 9 10 are granted. The plaintiffs' written submissions establish that if defendants were informed of this proceeding before a TRO could issue, assets would likely be redirected, defeating plaintiffs' interests in identifying defendants, stopping the infringement, and obtaining an accounting. In addition, the submitted evidence establishes a likelihood of success on the merits as to the defendants listed in the Schedule A, the harm to plaintiffs is irreparable, and an injunction is in the public interest because infringement interferes with the plaintiffs' ability to control their intellectual property and causes consumer confusion. Those rights cannot be fully compensated by money damages. There is no countervailing harm to defendants from an order directing them to stop infringement. Electronic service of process does not violate any treaty and is consistent with due process because it is an effective, perhaps the most effective, way to communicate with defendants. Expedited discovery is warranted to identify defendants and implement the asset freeze. If any defendant were to appear and object, the court will take a fresh look at the asset freeze, joinder, and personal jurisdiction. A $50,000 bond is sufficient to secure the injunction, and must be posted within one week. Enter Sealed TRO. Mailed notice.
[+] 16 2022-06-07 SEALED ORDER. Signed by the Honorable Manish S. Shah on 6/7/2022.
17 2022-06-10 SURETY BOND in the amount of $ 50,000.00 posted by Khara Inc.
18 2022-06-17 MOTION by Plaintiffs Ground Works Co., Ltd., Khara Inc. for extension of time for Temporary Restraining Order
19 2022-06-20 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Manish S. Shah: The motion for extension of time [18] is granted. The TRO is extended to 7/5/22.
20 2022-06-22 MOTION by Plaintiffs Ground Works Co., Ltd., Khara Inc. for preliminary injunction
[+] 21 2022-06-22 MEMORANDUM by Ground Works Co., Ltd., Khara Inc. in support of motion for preliminary injunction[20]
[+] 22 2022-06-22 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Khara Inc., Ground Works Co., Ltd. as to The Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule A on 6/22/2022, answer due 7/13/2022.
23 2022-06-23 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Manish S. Shah: Any objections to the motion for a preliminary injunction 20 must be properly filed by 6/30/2022. If no objections are filed, the motion will be considered unopposed.
24 2022-07-01 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Manish S. Shah: Plaintiff's motion for a preliminary injunction 20 is granted. No defendant has appeared or objected to the motion. The evidence submitted in support of the TRO also supports the entry of a preliminary injunction. Enter preliminary injunction. The Clerk is directed to unseal any previously sealed documents in this matter. Plaintiff's counsel is directed to add all defendants listed on Schedule A to the court's docket within three business days. Instructions on how to do so may be located on the court's website at www.ilnd.uscourts.gov/instructions. Notices mailed.
[+] 25 2022-07-01 PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION ORDER. Signed by the Honorable Manish S. Shah on 7/1/2022. Notices mailed.
26 2022-07-11 NOTICE of Voluntary Dismissal by All Plaintiffs
27 2022-07-14 MOTION by Plaintiffs Ground Works Co., Ltd., Khara Inc. for default judgment as to The Defendants Identified In The First Amended Schedule A
[+] 28 2022-07-14 MEMORANDUM by Ground Works Co., Ltd., Khara Inc. in support of motion for default judgment[27]
29 2022-07-15 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Manish S. Shah: Any objections to the motion for default judgment must be properly filed by 7/22/22. If no objections are filed, the motion will be considered unopposed. Notices mailed.
30 2022-07-18 NOTICE of Voluntary Dismissal by All Plaintiffs
31 2022-07-18 NOTICE of Voluntary Dismissal by All Plaintiffs
32 2022-07-23 NOTICE of Voluntary Dismissal by All Plaintiffs
33 2022-07-25 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Manish S. Shah: No defendants have appeared to object to plaintiffs' motion for entry of default judgment. The motion [27] is granted. Based on the evidence submitted in support of the temporary restraining order and the admission of liability by virtue of the default, plaintiffs have established that a permanent injunction should be entered. The infringement of plaintiffs' intellectual property irreparably harms plaintiffs and confuses the public. The infringement was willful and statutory damages are awarded. After considering the nature of the products, the price point, the absence of any concrete evidence of lost profits or high-volume infringement by defendants, the strong value of the plaintiffs' brand, and the need to deter infringement that is easily committed and difficult to stop, the court concludes that $100,000 is an appropriate award of statutory damages. Enter Default Judgment Order. Terminate civil case. Mailed notice
34 2022-07-25 DEFAULT JUDGMENT ORDER signed by the Honorable Manish S. Shah on 7/25/2022. Mailed notice
35 2022-07-26 MAILED Trademark report, along with certified copies of order and judgment dated 7/25/2022 to Patent Trademark Office, Alexandria VA
36 2022-08-15 NOTICE of Voluntary Dismissal by All Plaintiffs