|
[+]
1
|
2022-10-05 |
COMPLAINT filed by Board of Regents for Oklahoma State University ; Filing fee $ 402, receipt number AILNDC-19913328. |
|
|
Exhibit 1 |
|
|
Exhibit 2 |
|
|
Exhibit 3 |
|
|
Exhibit 4 |
|
2
|
2022-10-05 |
SEALED EXHIBIT by Plaintiff Board of Regents for Oklahoma State University Schedule A regarding complaint[1] |
|
3
|
2022-10-05 |
MOTION by Plaintiff Board of Regents for Oklahoma State University for leave to file under seal |
|
4
|
2022-10-05 |
CIVIL Cover Sheet |
|
5
|
2022-10-05 |
Notice of Claims Involving Trademarks by Board of Regents for Oklahoma State University |
|
6
|
2022-10-05 |
ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Board of Regents for Oklahoma State University by Justin R. Gaudio |
|
7
|
2022-10-05 |
ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Board of Regents for Oklahoma State University by Amy Crout Ziegler |
|
8
|
2022-10-05 |
ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Board of Regents for Oklahoma State University by Allyson M. Martin |
|
9
|
2022-10-05 |
ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Board of Regents for Oklahoma State University by Jake Michael Christensen |
|
[+]
10
|
2022-10-05 |
ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Board of Regents for Oklahoma State University by Rachel S Miller |
|
|
CLERK'S NOTICE: Pursuant to Local Rule 73.1(b), a United States Magistrate Judge of this court is available to conduct all proceedings in this civil action. If all parties consent to have the currently assigned United States Magistrate Judge conduct all proceedings in this case, including trial, the entry of final judgment, and all post-trial proceedings, all parties must sign their names on the attached Consent To form. This consent form is eligible for filing only if executed by all parties. The parties can also express their consent to jurisdiction by a magistrate judge in any joint filing, including the Joint Initial Status Report or proposed Case Management Order. |
|
11
|
2022-10-06 |
MAILED trademark report to Patent Trademark Office, Alexandria VA. |
|
12
|
2022-10-07 |
MAILED to plaintiff(s) counsel Lanham Mediation Program materials |
|
13
|
2022-10-10 |
MOTION by Plaintiff Board of Regents for Oklahoma State University for temporary restraining order Including a Temporary Injunction, Temporary Transfer of the Domain Names, Temporary Asset Restraint, and Expedited Discovery |
|
14
|
2022-10-10 |
MEMORANDUM by Board of Regents for Oklahoma State University in support of motion for temporary restraining order 13 |
|
[+]
15
|
2022-10-10 |
DECLARATION of Justin R. Gaudio regarding memorandum in support of motion 14 |
|
|
Exhibit 1 |
|
|
Exhibit 2 |
|
|
Exhibit 3 |
|
|
(Exhibit 4) |
|
[+]
16
|
2022-10-10 |
DECLARATION of Kurtis Mason regarding memorandum in support of motion 14 |
|
|
Exhibit 1 |
|
|
(Exhibit 2) |
|
17
|
2022-10-10 |
DECLARATION of Lindsay Conn regarding memorandum in support of motion 14 |
|
[+]
18
|
2022-10-10 |
SEALED EXHIBIT by Plaintiff Board of Regents for Oklahoma State University Exhibit 1 - Parts 1-2 regarding declaration 17 |
|
|
Exhibit 1-1 |
|
|
(Exhibit 1-2) |
|
19
|
2022-10-10 |
SEALED EXHIBIT by Plaintiff Board of Regents for Oklahoma State University Exhibit 2 regarding declaration 17 |
|
20
|
2022-10-10 |
MOTION by Plaintiff Board of Regents for Oklahoma State University for Electronic Service of Process Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 4(f)(3) |
|
21
|
2022-10-10 |
MEMORANDUM by Board of Regents for Oklahoma State University in support of motion for miscellaneous relief 20 |
|
[+]
22
|
2022-10-10 |
DECLARATION of Justin R. Gaudio regarding memorandum in support of motion 21 |
|
|
Exhibit 1 |
|
|
Exhibit 2 |
|
|
(Exhibit 3) |
|
23
|
2022-10-25 |
MINUTE entry before the Honorable Manish S. Shah: Plaintiff's ex parte motion to seal, motion for a temporary restraining order, domain transfer, asset restraint, and expedited discovery, and motion for electronic service of process [3] [13] [20] are granted. The plaintiff's written submissions establish that if defendants were informed of this proceeding before a TRO could issue, assets would likely be redirected, defeating plaintiff's interests in identifying defendants, stopping the infringement, and obtaining an accounting. In addition, the submitted evidence establishes a likelihood of success on the merits, the harm to plaintiff is irreparable and an injunction is in the public interest because infringement interferes with the plaintiff's ability to control its intellectual property. Those rights cannot be fully compensated by money damages. There is no countervailing harm to defendants from an order directing them to stop infringement. Electronic service of process does not violate any treaty and is consistent with due process because it is an effective, perhaps the most effective, way to communicate with defendants. Expedited discovery is warranted to identify defendants and implement the asset freeze. If any defendant were to appear and object, the court will take a fresh look at the asset freeze, joinder, and personal jurisdiction. A $10,000 bond is sufficient to secure the injunctive relief. Enter Sealed Temporary Restraining Order. Notices mailed. |
|
[+]
24
|
2022-10-25 |
SEALED TEMPORARY RESTRAINING ORDER. Signed by the Honorable Manish S. Shah on 10/25/2022. Notices mailed. |
|
|
SUMMONS Issued as to Defendant The Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule A |
|
|
SUMMONS Issued as to Defendant The Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule A |
|
25
|
2022-10-31 |
SURETY BOND in the amount of $ 10,000.00 posted by Board of Regents for Oklahoma State University. (Document not imaged) |
|
26
|
2022-11-03 |
MOTION by Plaintiff Board of Regents for Oklahoma State University for extension of time of Temporary Restraining Order |
|
[+]
27
|
2022-11-03 |
MEMORANDUM by Board of Regents for Oklahoma State University in support of extension of time[26] |
|
|
Declaration of Jake M. Christensen |
|
28
|
2022-11-04 |
MINUTE entry before the Honorable Manish S. Shah: The motion for extension of time 26 is granted. The TRO is extended to 11/22/22. Notices mailed. |
|
[+]
29
|
2022-11-17 |
MOTION by Plaintiff Board of Regents for Oklahoma State University for preliminary injunction |
|
|
Exhibit A |
|
[+]
30
|
2022-11-17 |
MEMORANDUM by Board of Regents for Oklahoma State University in support of motion for preliminary injunction[29] |
|
|
Declaration of Jake M. Christensen |
|
|
Exhibit 1 |
|
[+]
31
|
2022-11-17 |
SUMMONS Returned Executed by Board of Regents for Oklahoma State University as to The Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule A on 11/17/2022, answer due 12/8/2022. |
|
|
Declaration of Rachel S. Miller |
|
|
Exhibit A |
|
32
|
2022-11-18 |
MINUTE entry before the Honorable Manish S. Shah: Any objections to the motion for a preliminary injunction must be properly filed by 11/21/22. If no objections are filed, the motion will be considered unopposed. Notices mailed. |
|
33
|
2022-11-22 |
MINUTE entry before the Honorable Manish S. Shah: No defendants have appeared or objected to the motion for a preliminary injunction. The evidence in support of the TRO continues to support the entry of a preliminary injunction. The motion 29 is granted. Enter preliminary injunction. The Clerk is directed to unseal any previously sealed documents in this matter. Plaintiff's counsel is directed to add all defendants listed on Schedule A to the court's docket within three business days. Instructions on how to do so may be located on the court's website at www.ilnd.uscourts.gov/instructions. Notices mailed. |
|
[+]
34
|
2022-11-22 |
PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION ORDER. Signed by the Honorable Manish S. Shah on 11/22/2022. Notices mailed. |
|
|
NEW PARTIES: CARONG ORPER9, LANWINCT, LOVE BLUEBELLS, menglongjiededian, RITTY BONGBENG, SUOSUO MIMA, SWALLOW SALLY, huangyinghao8637, muellerharold59, opdsjbshgc, qianchenghao3967, st901066, ukdfhisufisdtf, wanggang4622, zhouziyan3103, osucowboys.store, collegegame.store, jerseysidestore.com, shopcollbaseball.com and cowboyscollegestore.com added to case caption. |
|
[+]
35
|
2022-12-09 |
MOTION by Plaintiff Board of Regents for Oklahoma State University for entry of default, MOTION by Plaintiff Board of Regents for Oklahoma State University for default judgment as to all Defendants |
|
|
(Exhibit A) |
|
[+]
36
|
2022-12-09 |
MEMORANDUM by Board of Regents for Oklahoma State University in support of motion for entry of default, motion for default judgment, 35 |
|
|
(Exhibit 1) |
|
[+]
37
|
2022-12-09 |
DECLARATION of Justin R. Gaudio regarding memorandum in support of motion 36 |
|
|
(Exhibit 1) |
|
[+]
38
|
2022-12-09 |
NOTICE of Motion by Jake Michael Christensen for presentment of motion for entry of default, motion for default judgment, 35 before Honorable Manish S. Shah on 12/14/2022 at 09:45 AM. |
|
|
(Exhibit A) |
|
39
|
2022-12-14 |
ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Board of Regents for Oklahoma State University by Kahlia Roe Halpern |
|
40
|
2022-12-14 |
MINUTE entry before the Honorable Manish S. Shah: For the reasons stated in open court, the motion for default judgment [35] is granted. Enter Default Judgment. Terminate civil case. Notices mailed. |
|
41
|
2022-12-14 |
FINAL JUDGMENT ORDER. Signed by the Honorable Manish S. Shah on 12/14/2022. Notices mailed. |
|
42
|
2022-12-16 |
MAILED trademark report with certified copy of minute order dated 12/14/2022 to Patent Trademark Office, Alexandria VA |
