|
[+]
1
|
2025-07-24 |
COMPLAINT filed by Jennifer Lambein; Filing fee $ 405, receipt number AILNDC-23790701. |
|
|
Exhibit 1 |
|
|
Exhibit 2 |
|
|
Exhibit 3 |
|
|
(Exhibit 4) |
|
2
|
2025-07-24 |
SEALED DOCUMENT by Plaintiff Jennifer Lambein Schedule A to Complaint 1 |
|
3
|
2025-07-24 |
CIVIL Cover Sheet |
|
4
|
2025-07-24 |
ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Jennifer Lambein by Keith A. Vogt |
|
5
|
2025-07-24 |
ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Jennifer Lambein by Yanling Jiang |
|
6
|
2025-07-24 |
ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Jennifer Lambein by Adam Grodman |
|
7
|
2025-07-24 |
ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Jennifer Lambein by Cameron Eugene Mcintyre |
|
8
|
2025-07-24 |
ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Jennifer Lambein by Monica Rita Martin |
|
9
|
2025-07-24 |
ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Jennifer Lambein by Yi Bu |
|
[+]
10
|
2025-07-24 |
ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Jennifer Lambein by Christopher Romero |
|
|
CASE ASSIGNED to the Honorable John J. Tharp, Jr. Designated as Magistrate Judge the Honorable Jeffrey T. Gilbert. Case assignment: Random assignment. (Civil Category 3). (Text entry; no document attached.) |
|
|
CLERK'S NOTICE: Pursuant to Local Rule 73.1(b), a United States Magistrate Judge of this court is available to conduct all proceedings in this civil action. If all parties consent to have the currently assigned United States Magistrate Judge conduct all proceedings in this case, including trial, the entry of final judgment, and all post-trial proceedings, all parties must sign their names on the attached Consent To form. This consent form is eligible for filing only if executed by all parties. The parties can also express their consent to jurisdiction by a magistrate judge in any joint filing, including the Joint Initial Status Report or proposed Case Management Order. (Text entry; no document attached.) |
|
11
|
2025-07-28 |
MINUTE entry before the Honorable John J. Tharp, Jr: By 8/1/25, the plaintiff is required to file (1) a listing of all prior online trademark, copyright, or patent infringement cases (also known as "Schedule A" cases) filed in any court in the United States in which it was a plaintiff, and (2) a listing of any of the defendants included in the Schedule A in this case that the plaintiff has previously named as a defendant in any prior complaint or Schedule A case. Mailed notice |
|
[+]
13
|
2025-07-29 |
MEMORANDUM in support of 12 Exparte motion |
|
|
Exhibit 1 |
|
|
Declaration of Keith A. Vogt |
|
|
(Exhibit 1-2, of Keith A. Vogt's declaration) |
|
14
|
2025-07-29 |
SUPPLEMENT to Supplemental Information in Support of Plaintiffs Motion 12 |
|
15
|
2025-07-30 |
MINUTE entry before the Honorable John J. Tharp, Jr: The plaintiff's motion for a temporary restraining order 12 is taken under advisement. By 8/6/25, the plaintiff is required to supplement its motion with (1) a certification that the plaintiff has not used any of the screenshot evidence supplied in support of its motion in any prior proceeding, and (2) an index that matches each defendant to the screenshots supplied in support of the motion, lists the dates those screenshots were taken, and identifies, on a defendant-by-defendant basis, the specific trademarks each defendant has allegedly infringed. Additionally, upon review of the supporting exhibits, the screenshots do not show a single trademark that was allegedly infringed by each of the defendants listed in the plaintiff's Schedule A, raising a question as to the propriety of joinder. Plaintiff is directed to supplement the TRO motion with a brief explaining why joinder is proper notwithstanding the lack of a single trademark common to all defendants. (In other words, the brief should explain why joinder of claims of infringement of different trademarks is appropriate in this case.) If the brief contains new screenshots, those screenshots must be included in an updated version of the certification and index attached to Plaintiff's TRO motion. Alternatively, the plaintiff may amend its complaint to include only defendants alleged to have violated the same trademark and file a renewed motion for entry of a TRO. Mailed notice |
|
21
|
2025-08-04 |
MINUTE entry before the Honorable John J. Tharp, Jr:Upon review, plaintiff's renewed motion for leave to conduct expedited discovery and electronic service of process 18 is granted. Plaintiff's original motion 12 is denied as moot. Mailed notice |
|
23
|
2025-08-06 |
SUMMONS Issued (Court Participant) as to Defendant The Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule A |
|
24
|
2025-08-07 |
MAILED copyright report to Registrar, Washington DC. (jn,) |
|
26
|
2025-09-10 |
MOTION by Plaintiff Jennifer Lambein for default judgment as to The Defendants Identified In Amended Schedule A |
|
28
|
2025-09-11 |
MINUTE entry before the Honorable John J. Tharp, Jr:Plaintiff's motion for entry of default and default judgment [26] is taken under advisement. Any objections or responses are due by 9/22/25. The plaintiff is directed to provide defendants with notice of the default proceedings against them by 9/15/25. To effectuate that notice, the Court directs the plaintiff to (1) update the website through which it has been publishing information about the case to provide notice of its motion for entry of default and default judgment, as well as the deadline to object set forth in this order, and (2) send an email to the email addresses provided for the defendants by third parties (or otherwise obtained by the plaintiff) informing them of the default proceedings against them, attaching a copy of plaintiff's motion for default judgment, memorandum in support thereof, and this order, and containing a link to the updated website. Mailed notice |
