|
[+]
1
|
2025-08-12 |
COMPLAINT filed by COSRX Inc. ; Filing fee $ 405, receipt number AILNDC-23873161. |
|
|
Exhibit 1 |
|
2
|
2025-08-12 |
SEALED EXHIBIT by Plaintiff COSRX Inc. Schedule A regarding complaint[1] |
|
3
|
2025-08-12 |
MOTION by Plaintiff COSRX Inc. for leave to file under seal |
|
4
|
2025-08-12 |
CIVIL Cover Sheet |
|
5
|
2025-08-12 |
NOTIFICATION of Affiliates pursuant to Local Rule 3.2 by COSRX Inc. |
|
6
|
2025-08-12 |
Notice of Claims Involving Trademarks by COSRX Inc. |
|
7
|
2025-08-12 |
ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff COSRX Inc. by Justin R. Gaudio |
|
8
|
2025-08-12 |
ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff COSRX Inc. by Amy Crout Ziegler |
|
9
|
2025-08-12 |
ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff COSRX Inc. by Rachel S Miller |
|
[+]
10
|
2025-08-12 |
ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff COSRX Inc. by Rachel Meira Ackerman |
|
|
CASE ASSIGNED to the Honorable Jorge L. Alonso. Designated as Magistrate Judge the Honorable Beth W. Jantz. Case assignment: Random assignment. (Civil Category 2). (Text entry; no document attached.) |
|
|
CLERK'S NOTICE: Pursuant to Local Rule 73.1(b), a United States Magistrate Judge of this court is available to conduct all proceedings in this civil action. If all parties consent to have the currently assigned United States Magistrate Judge conduct all proceedings in this case, including trial, the entry of final judgment, and all post-trial proceedings, all parties must sign their names on the attached Consent To form. This consent form is eligible for filing only if executed by all parties. The parties can also express their consent to jurisdiction by a magistrate judge in any joint filing, including the Joint Initial Status Report or proposed Case Management Order. (Text entry; no document attached.) |
|
11
|
2025-08-13 |
MAILED trademark report to Patent Trademark Office, Alexandria VA |
|
12
|
2025-08-13 |
MAILED to plaintiff(s) counsel Lanham Mediation Program materials |
|
13
|
2025-08-15 |
MOTION by Plaintiff COSRX Inc. for temporary restraining order including a Temporary Injunction, a Temporary Asset Restraint, and Expedited Discovery |
|
14
|
2025-08-15 |
MEMORANDUM by COSRX Inc. in support of motion for temporary restraining order[13] |
|
15
|
2025-08-15 |
DECLARATION of Justin R. Gaudio regarding memorandum in support of motion[14] |
|
[+]
16
|
2025-08-15 |
DECLARATION of Jun Sang Hun regarding memorandum in support of motion[14] |
|
|
Exhibit 1 |
|
17
|
2025-08-15 |
SEALED EXHIBIT by Plaintiff COSRX Inc. Exhibit 2 regarding declaration[16] |
|
18
|
2025-08-15 |
MOTION by Plaintiff COSRX Inc. for Electronic Service of Process Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 4(f)(3) |
|
19
|
2025-08-15 |
MEMORANDUM by COSRX Inc. in support of motion for miscellaneous relief[18] |
|
20
|
2025-08-15 |
DECLARATION of Justin R. Gaudio regarding memorandum in support of motion[19] |
|
21
|
2025-08-15 |
NOTICE of Motion by Justin R. Gaudio for presentment of motion for temporary restraining order[13], motion for miscellaneous relief[18], motion for leave to file[3] before Honorable Jorge L. Alonso on 8/21/2025 at 09:30 AM. |
|
22
|
2025-08-20 |
ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff COSRX Inc. by Trevor Christian Talhami |
|
23
|
2025-08-20 |
MINUTE entry before the Honorable Jorge L. Alonso: Plaintiff's ex parte motions [3] [13] [18] are granted, and no appearance is necessary. The plaintiff's written submissions establish that if defendants were informed of this proceeding before a TRO could issue, assets would likely be redirected, defeating plaintiff's interests in identifying defendants, stopping the infringement, and obtaining an accounting. In addition, the submitted evidence establishes a likelihood of success on the merits, the harm to plaintiff is irreparable and an injunction is in the public interest because infringement interferes with the plaintiff's ability to control its intellectual property. Those rights cannot be fully compensated by money damages. There is no countervailing harm to defendants from an order directing them to stop infringement. Electronic service of process does not violate any treaty and is consistent with due process because it is an effective, perhaps the most effective, way to communicate with defendants. Expedited discovery is warranted to identify defendants and implement the asset freeze. If any defendant were to appear and object, the court will take a fresh look at the asset freeze, joinder, and personal jurisdiction. The court finds that security in the amount of $29,000--$1,000 per defendantis sufficient to secure the injunctive relief. Motion hearing set for 8/20/25 is stricken.Notice mailed by Judge's staff |
|
24
|
2025-08-21 |
SEALED TEMPORARY Restraining Order. Signed by the Honorable Jorge L. Alonso on 8/21/2025. Notice mailed by Judge's staff |
|
25
|
2025-08-21 |
Registry Deposit Information Form by COSRX Inc. |
|
26
|
2025-08-21 |
SUMMONS Submitted (Court Participant) for defendant(s) Baisituo and all other Defendants identified in the Complaint by Plaintiff COSRX Inc. |
|
27
|
2025-08-21 |
SUMMONS Issued (Court Participant) as to Defendant The Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule A |
|
28
|
2025-08-28 |
SURETY BOND in the amount of $ 29,000 posted by COSRX Inc. (Document not scanned) |
|
29
|
2025-08-29 |
MOTION by Plaintiff COSRX Inc. for extension of time of Temporary Restraining Order |
|
30
|
2025-08-29 |
MEMORANDUM by COSRX Inc. in support of extension of time[29] |
|
31
|
2025-08-29 |
DECLARATION of Rachel S. Miller regarding memorandum in support of motion[30] |
|
32
|
2025-08-29 |
NOTICE of Motion by Rachel S Miller for presentment of extension of time[29] before Honorable Jorge L. Alonso on 9/4/2025 at 09:30 AM. |
|
33
|
2025-09-03 |
MINUTE entry before the Honorable Jorge L. Alonso: Plaintiff's Ex Parte Motion to extend the temporary restraining order [29] is granted. The temporary restraining order is extended for 14 days to 9/18/25. Telephonic status hearing set for 9/18/25 at 9:30 a.m. Members of the public and media will be able to call in to listen to this hearing. The call-in number is 650-479-3207 and the access code is 1804010308. Persons granted remote access to proceedings are reminded of the general prohibition against photographing, recording, and rebroadcasting of court proceedings. Violation of these prohibitions may result in sanctions, including removal of court issued media credentials, restricted entry to future hearings, denial of entry to future hearings, or any other sanctions deemed necessary by the Court. Notice mailed by Judge's staff |
|
34
|
2025-09-07 |
OPPOSITION by Defendant FDPR Home Harmony to temporary restraining order and MOTION to dissolve or modify TRO (Exhibits) (Received via pro se online portal on 09/07/2025.) (bi,) |
|
35
|
2025-09-08 |
NOTICE OF ERRATA by FDPR Home Harmony (Received via pro se online portal on 09/08/2025.) (bi,) |
|
36
|
2025-09-08 |
OPPOSITION by Defendant FDPR Home Harmony to temporary restraining order and MOTION to dissolve or modify TRO (Received via pro se online portal on 09/08/2025.) (bi,) |
|
[+]
37
|
2025-09-08 |
MOTION by Plaintiff COSRX Inc. to strike MOTION by Defendant FDPR Home Harmony [34], MOTION by Defendant FDPR Home Harmony [36] |
|
|
Exhibit A |
|
38
|
2025-09-08 |
NOTICE of Motion by Rachel S Miller for presentment of motion to strike[37] before Honorable Jorge L. Alonso on 9/16/2025 at 09:30 AM. |
|
39
|
2025-09-08 |
RESPONSE by FDPR Home Harmony to Plaintiff's motion to strike [37] (Exhibits) (Received via pro se online portal on 09/08/25.) (bi,) |
|
40
|
2025-09-09 |
NOTICE OF FILING by FDPR Home Harmony (Received via pro se online portal on 09/09/25.) (bi,) |
|
41
|
2025-09-09 |
NOTICE of ERRATA by FDPR Home Harmony (Received via pro se online portal on 09/09/25.) (bi,) |
|
42
|
2025-09-09 |
SUPPLEMENTAL Submission of Evidence Demonstrating Abuse of Judicial Process by Defendant FDPR Home Harmony (Exhibits) (Received via pro se online portal on 09/09/25.) (bi,) |
|
43
|
2025-09-10 |
CERTIFICATE of Service by FDPR Home Harmony (Received via pro se online portal on 09/10/25.) (bi,) |
