|
[+]
1
|
2025-08-21 |
COMPLAINT filed by David E. LaChapelle; Filing fee $ 405, receipt number AILNDC-23928209. |
|
|
(Exhibit 1) |
|
2
|
2025-08-21 |
SEALED DOCUMENT by Plaintiff David E. LaChapelle Schedule A to Complaint 1 |
|
3
|
2025-08-21 |
CIVIL Cover Sheet |
|
4
|
2025-08-21 |
ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff David E. LaChapelle by Keith A. Vogt |
|
5
|
2025-08-21 |
ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff David E. LaChapelle by Yanling Jiang |
|
6
|
2025-08-21 |
ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff David E. LaChapelle by Adam Grodman |
|
7
|
2025-08-21 |
ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff David E. LaChapelle by Cameron Eugene Mcintyre |
|
8
|
2025-08-21 |
ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff David E. LaChapelle by Monica Rita Martin |
|
9
|
2025-08-21 |
ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff David E. LaChapelle by Yi Bu |
|
[+]
10
|
2025-08-21 |
ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff David E. LaChapelle by Christopher Romero |
|
|
CASE ASSIGNED to the Honorable Georgia N. Alexakis. Designated as Magistrate Judge the Honorable Jeannice W. Appenteng. Case assignment: Random assignment. (Civil Category 3). |
|
|
CLERK'S NOTICE: Pursuant to Local Rule 73.1(b), a United States Magistrate Judge of this court is available to conduct all proceedings in this civil action. If all parties consent to have the currently assigned United States Magistrate Judge conduct all proceedings in this case, including trial, the entry of final judgment, and all post-trial proceedings, all parties must sign their names on the attached Consent To form. This consent form is eligible for filing only if executed by all parties. The parties can also express their consent to jurisdiction by a magistrate judge in any joint filing, including the Joint Initial Status Report or proposed Case Management Order. |
|
11
|
2025-08-25 |
MINUTE entry before the Honorable Georgia N. Alexakis: Upon review of the complaint, the Court sua sponte raises the propriety of joining 56 defendants in a single action. By 9/9/25, plaintiff must file a supplemental memorandum addressing the propriety of joinder in light of this Court's orders in Bug Art Limited v. The Partnerships, 24 CV 7777, Dkt. 28 (N.D. Ill. Oct. 28, 2024), and Anagram International v. The Partnerships, 24 CV 12194, Dkt. 87 (N.D. Ill. Feb. 21, 2025). In the alternative, plaintiff has leave to file an amended complaint by 9/9/25 with a smaller subset of defendants along with a memorandum explaining why that smaller subset of defendants is properly joined. No motion for an ex parte temporary restraining order should be filed in this matter without counsel first consulting this Court's order in Wham-O Holding v. The Partnerships, 24 CV 12523, Dkt. 39 (N.D. Ill. Feb. 20, 2025). |
|
12
|
2025-08-25 |
Amended Schedule A to the Complaint 1 and Schedule A 2 by David E. LaChapelle |
|
13
|
2025-08-26 |
MINUTE entry before the Honorable Georgia N. Alexakis: Initial status hearing is set for 11/4/25 at 9:30 a.m. in person in Courtroom 1719. By 10/28/25, the parties shall file a Joint Initial Status Report that complies with the Court's standing order, which can be found on the Court's website. If the defendant(s) have not been served by the initial status hearing date, counsel for Plaintiff must contact the Courtroom Deputy to reschedule the status hearing and the date for filing the Joint Initial Status Report. |
|
[+]
15
|
2025-09-12 |
MEMORANDUM in support of 14 Exparte motion |
|
|
Exhibit 1 |
|
|
Declaration of Keith A. Vogt |
|
|
(Exhibit 1-2, of Keith A. Vogt's declaration) |
|
16
|
2025-09-12 |
Presentment for Exparte motion 14 and NOTICE of Motion by Keith A. Vogt for presentment of before Honorable Georgia N. Alexakis on 9/22/2025 at 09:30 AM. |
|
17
|
2025-09-19 |
MINUTE entry before the Honorable Georgia N. Alexakis: Plaintiff's motion for expedited discovery and electronic service of process [14] is granted. No appearance is required on 9/22/25. The Court finds that expedited discovery is warranted to identify defendants. The Court also finds that electronic service does not violate any treaty and is consistent with due process because it is an effective way to communicate with the online marketplace defendants. The Court decides these issues, however, without the benefit of adversarial presentation. If any defendant were to appear and object, the Court will take a fresh look at the issues of electronic service and expedited discovery as well as any issues related to personal jurisdiction. Enter Order, as modified by the Court. |
|
18
|
2025-09-19 |
ORDER for leave to conduct expedited discovery and service of process by email and or electronic publication. Signed by the Honorable Georgia N. Alexakis on 9/19/25. |
