|
[+]
1
|
2025-10-30 |
COMPLAINT filed by Jennifer Megan Budrock; Filing fee $ 405, receipt number AILNDC-24278891. |
|
|
(Exhibit 1) |
|
2
|
2025-10-30 |
SEALED DOCUMENT by Plaintiff Jennifer Megan Budrock Schedule A to Complaint 1 |
|
3
|
2025-10-30 |
CIVIL Cover Sheet |
|
4
|
2025-10-30 |
ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Jennifer Megan Budrock by Keith A. Vogt |
|
5
|
2025-10-30 |
ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Jennifer Megan Budrock by Yanling Jiang |
|
6
|
2025-10-30 |
ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Jennifer Megan Budrock by Yi Bu |
|
7
|
2025-10-30 |
ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Jennifer Megan Budrock by Monica Rita Martin |
|
8
|
2025-10-30 |
ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Jennifer Megan Budrock by Christopher Romero |
|
9
|
2025-10-30 |
ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Jennifer Megan Budrock by Cameron Eugene Mcintyre |
|
[+]
10
|
2025-10-30 |
ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Jennifer Megan Budrock by Adam Grodman |
|
|
CASE ASSIGNED to the Honorable Jeffrey I Cummings. Designated as Magistrate Judge the Honorable Heather K. McShain. Case assignment: Random assignment. (Civil Category 3). |
|
|
CLERK'S NOTICE: Pursuant to Local Rule 73.1(b), a United States Magistrate Judge of this court is available to conduct all proceedings in this civil action. If all parties consent to have the currently assigned United States Magistrate Judge conduct all proceedings in this case, including trial, the entry of final judgment, and all post-trial proceedings, all parties must sign their names on the attached Consent To form. This consent form is eligible for filing only if executed by all parties. The parties can also express their consent to jurisdiction by a magistrate judge in any joint filing, including the Joint Initial Status Report or proposed Case Management Order. |
|
11
|
2025-10-31 |
MAILED copyright report to Registrar, Washington DC (bi,) |
|
12
|
2025-11-03 |
MOTION by Plaintiff Jennifer Megan Budrock for leave to file under seal |
|
13
|
2025-11-03 |
MOTION by Plaintiff Jennifer Megan Budrock for leave to file excess pages |
|
[+]
15
|
2025-11-03 |
MEMORANDUM in support of 14 Exparte motion |
|
|
Declaration of Keith A. Vogt |
|
|
Exhibit 1-2, of Keith A. Vogt's declaration |
|
|
Declaration of Jennifer Megan Budrock |
|
|
(Exhibit 1, of Jennifer Megan Budrock's declaration) |
|
[+]
16
|
2025-11-03 |
SEALED EXHIBIT by Plaintiff Jennifer Megan Budrock Sealed Exhibit 2, Declaration of Jennifer Megan Budrock regarding memorandum in support of motion, 15 |
|
|
(Exhibit 2) |
|
17
|
2025-11-24 |
MINUTE entry before the Honorable Jeffrey I Cummings: This case has been assigned to the calendar of Judge Jeffrey I. Cummings. Plaintiff's motion for leave to file under seal [12], motion for leave to file excess pages [13], and ex parte motion for a temporary restraining order, including a temporary injunction, a temporary asset restraint, expedited discovery, and for electronic service of process [14] are granted. Plaintiff's submissions establish that, were defendants to learn of these proceedings before the execution of plaintiff's requested preliminary injunctive relief, there is a significant risk that defendants could destroy relevant documentary evidence and hide or transfer assets beyond the reach of the Court. Accordingly, subject to unsealing at an appropriate time, plaintiff may file under seal the documents identified in the motion to seal. The Temporary Restraining Order being entered along with this minute order shall also be placed under seal. In addition, for the purpose of the motions cited above, plaintiff's filings support proceeding on an ex parte basis at this time. Specifically, and as noted above, were defendants to be informed of this proceeding before a TRO could issue, the Court finds that it is likely that their assets and websites would be redirected, thus defeating plaintiff's interests in identifying defendants, stopping defendants' infringing conduct, and obtaining an accounting. In addition, the evidence submitted by plaintiff shows a likelihood of success on the merits (including evidence of active infringement and sales into Illinois), that the harm to plaintiff is irreparable, and that an injunction is in the public interest. An injunction serves the public interest because of the consumer confusion caused by counterfeit goods, and there is no countervailing harm to defendants from an order directing them to stop infringement. Electronic service of process does not violate any treaty and is consistent with due process because it effectively communicates the pendency of this action to defendants. Expedited discovery is warranted to identify defendants and to implement the asset freeze. Enter Sealed Temporary Restraining Order. Tracking status hearing set for 1/9/26 at 9:00 a.m. (to track the case only, no appearance is required). Mailed notice |
|
18
|
2025-11-24 |
SEALED ORDER Signed by the Honorable Jeffrey I Cummings on 11/24/2025. Mailed notice |
|
21
|
2025-12-02 |
Preliminary Injunction |
