TRO101 logo TRO101

2026-cv-08357

Toyota Motor Sales, U.S.A., Inc. v. The Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule A

法院:伊利诺伊州北法院
发案日期:2026-07-15
原告:Toyota Motor Sales, U.S.A., Inc.
代理律所:GBC
诉讼类型:商标
# Date Description
[+] 1 2026-07-15 COMPLAINT filed by Toyota Motor Sales, U.S.A., Inc.; Filing fee $ 405, receipt number AILNDC-25384953.
2 2026-07-15 SEALED EXHIBIT by Plaintiff Toyota Motor Sales, U.S.A., Inc. Schedule A regarding complaint[1]
3 2026-07-15 SEALED EXHIBIT by Plaintiff Toyota Motor Sales, U.S.A., Inc. Exhibit 2 Parts 1-2 regarding complaint[1]
4 2026-07-15 MOTION by Plaintiff Toyota Motor Sales, U.S.A., Inc. for leave to file under seal
5 2026-07-15 CIVIL Cover Sheet
6 2026-07-15 NOTIFICATION of Affiliates pursuant to Local Rule 3.2 by Toyota Motor Sales, U.S.A., Inc.
7 2026-07-15 Notice of Claims Involving Trademarks by Toyota Motor Sales, U.S.A., Inc.
8 2026-07-15 ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Toyota Motor Sales, U.S.A., Inc. by Justin R. Gaudio
9 2026-07-15 ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Toyota Motor Sales, U.S.A., Inc. by Amy Crout Ziegler
10 2026-07-15 ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Toyota Motor Sales, U.S.A., Inc. by Trevor Christian Talhami
[+] 11 2026-07-15 ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Toyota Motor Sales, U.S.A., Inc. by Madeline Halgren
12 2026-07-16 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Thomas M. Durkin: Motion for leave to file under seal [4] is granted. Mailed notice.
13 2026-07-16 MAILED trademark report to Patent Trademark Office, Alexandria VA
14 2026-07-16 MAILED to plaintiff(s) counsel Lanham Mediation Program materials
15 2026-07-16 MOTION by Plaintiff Toyota Motor Sales, U.S.A., Inc. for temporary restraining order including a Temporary Injunction, a Temporary Asset Restraint, and Expedited Discovery
16 2026-07-16 MEMORANDUM by Toyota Motor Sales, U.S.A., Inc. in support of motion for temporary restraining order[15]
17 2026-07-16 DECLARATION of Justin R. Gaudio regarding memorandum in support of motion[16]
[+] 18 2026-07-16 DECLARATION of Teena Bohi regarding memorandum in support of motion[16]
19 2026-07-16 SEALED EXHIBIT by Plaintiff Toyota Motor Sales, U.S.A., Inc. Exhibit 2 Parts 1-2 regarding declaration[18]
20 2026-07-16 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Thomas M. Durkin: The Court requires that any motion for a temporary restraining order and/or asset freeze is accompanied by a declaration from an attorney of record that provides the following information. First, to demonstrate the immediate harm necessary to grant the drastic remedy of an ex parte temporary restraining order, the declaration must confirm that each named defendant has sold or offered to sell the allegedly infringing product(s) within the last two months and describe the evidence supporting this confirmation. Generally, evidence that a defendant has sold or offered to sell the infringing products within the last two months may include: (1) screenshots of the listings collected within the last two months; (2) screenshots older than two months with an attestation that the listings reflected in the screenshots have been checked within the last two months and were active; or (3) evidence of a purchase by a customer in Illinois within the last two months. Second, as relevant to personal jurisdiction, without which any temporary restraining order or asset freeze would be invalid, the declaration must confirm that each named defendant sold at least one allegedly infringing product to a customer in Illinois and describe the evidence supporting this confirmation. Here, "sold" means that the defendant accepted an order and payment for an allegedly infringing product to be shipped to Illinois. Third, to assure that Court that the rights of defendants who have not yet been served are being appropriately protected, the declaration must identify the case number(s) and assigned judge(s) for any pending case(s) brought by the plaintiff(s) against any of the named defendants, noting whether the intellectual property at issue was the same or different than in this case. If it is the same, the declaration should describe the disposition of the other case. The Court will address any motion for a temporary restraining order only after receipt of the described declaration, which can be filed contemporaneously with the motion. Additionally, to the extent Plaintiff also makes a motion for expedited discovery or for an order permitting electronic service of process, Plaintiff should submit a proposed order for that relief that is separate from the proposed order for the TRO and asset restraint. The proposed order for the TRO and asset restraint should name the relevant defendants directly in the order, without reference to Schedule A. Mailed notice.
21 2026-07-17 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Thomas M. Durkin: Motion for temporary restraining order including a temporary injunction, a temporary asset restraint, and expedited discovery 15 is granted. Mailed notice.
22 2026-07-17 SEALED Temporary Restraining Order. Signed by the Honorable Thomas M. Durkin on 7/17/2026. Mailed notice.
23 2026-07-17 SEALED Order Authorizing Expedited Discovery. Signed by the Honorable Thomas M. Durkin on 7/17/2026. Mailed notice.
24 2026-07-17 Registry Deposit Information Form by Toyota Motor Sales, U.S.A., Inc.
[+] 25 2026-07-27 MOTION by Plaintiff Toyota Motor Sales, U.S.A., Inc. for preliminary injunction
26 2026-07-27 MEMORANDUM by Toyota Motor Sales, U.S.A., Inc. in support of motion for preliminary injunction 25
[+] 27 2026-07-27 DECLARATION of Trevor C. Talhami regarding memorandum in support of motion 26
28 2026-07-27 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Thomas M. Durkin: A telephone hearing as to the motion for preliminary injunction 25 is set for 7/30/2026 at 9:15 a.m. To join the telephone conference, dial (650) 479-3207, Access Code 180 815 7648. Throughout the hearing, each speaker will be expected to identify themselves for the record before speaking. Counsel must be in a quiet area while on the line. Please be sure to keep your phone on mute when you are not speaking. Persons granted remote access to proceedings are reminded of the general prohibition against photographing, recording, and rebroadcasting of court proceedings. Violation of these prohibitions may result in sanctions, including removal of court issued media credentials, restricted entry to future hearings, denial of entry to future hearings, or any other sanctions deemed necessary by the Court. Mailed notice.